Net Neutrality- Analysis after class and the class panel

Today we had a fierce panel discussion about Net Neutrality from different perspectives, including F.C.C., Comcast, AT&T, Verizon and small business representatives. From the point of an audience, I really want to comment on their arguments.

I was assigned to be a Comcast person. But, I don't really have any stance right now, given my limit understanding to the 5-years on & off issue.

Our representative was really active during the panel. Nice job! There was one point that he kept insisting on- providing better service for the customers. He brought up the Amazon 2 days shipping example. He asked the question that if Amazon can offer the audience a free 2 days shipping and better return policy, what the audience

If there isn't Net Neutrality, then Amazon can pay Comcast for more bandwidth (let say), then users can have a better experience surfing the Amazon stores than other online stores that don't pay Comcast. Then he asked the audience whether would like to go for Amazon or other stores which offer worse services(lo. People would definitely say we went for Amazon as it provided better service in the case. This is a rational customer behavior. He used the technique called "bundling" (If no one uses it before, then I coin it=]) to blur people' sights. He bundled something (2 day shipping) that's correct or makes sense to people with something that we are still uncertain about (whether net neutrality really help provide better service).

However, due to the time that I have, I am just going to discuss about Comcast today. I might talk about the others later if I still remember and once I have time. Also, I find that this short comment is kind of not that streamlined, but my point is straight and clear though.